The government should spend more money on skills and vocational training


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

The government should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

In today’s rapidly evolving job market, there is an ongoing debate about where government funding for education should be allocated. Some argue that the focus should be on skills and vocational training for practical work, while others believe that investment in university education is more beneficial. In my opinion, I agree that the government should allocate more funds towards skills and vocational training, but not at the expense of university education.

Firstly, it is undeniable that there is a growing demand for individuals with practical skills in various industries such as construction, healthcare, and technology. By investing in skills and vocational training, the government can address the current shortage of qualified workers in these fields, ultimately boosting economic growth. Furthermore, vocational training equips individuals with hands-on experience and specific skills that are directly applicable to the workforce, making them more employable in a shorter period of time.

However, this does not mean that university education should be neglected. University education plays a crucial role in fostering critical thinking, research skills, and providing a broad knowledge base that is essential for innovation and advancement in society. Moreover, many professions such as medicine, law, and engineering require a high level of theoretical knowledge that can only be acquired through university education.

Therefore, I believe that the government should strike a balance between funding for skills and vocational training and university education. This can be achieved through targeted funding for programs that bridge the gap between vocational training and higher education, such as apprenticeships and technical colleges. By doing so, the government can ensure that individuals have access to diverse educational pathways that cater to their individual strengths and career aspirations.

In conclusion, while it is important for the government to invest in skills and vocational training for practical work, it should not come at the expense of university education. A balanced approach to funding education will better serve the needs of a diverse and evolving workforce, ultimately contributing to overall societal and economic development.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Leave a Comment