Modern societies need specialists in certain fields


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the demand for specialists in certain fields is undeniable. As a result, some individuals argue that governments should fund university fees for students who choose to study subjects that are deemed crucial for the needs of society. While this proposal may seem reasonable on the surface, it is essential to carefully consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of such an educational policy.

On the one hand, providing financial support for students pursuing degrees in high-demand fields could have several positive outcomes. Firstly, it would likely lead to an increase in the number of professionals in areas such as healthcare, engineering, and technology, where there is a clear shortage of skilled workers. This, in turn, could contribute to the overall growth and development of the economy. Additionally, by incentivizing individuals to pursue these critical fields of study, the government could ensure that there is a steady supply of experts to address pressing societal challenges.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of this approach. By prioritizing funding for specific disciplines, there is a risk of undervaluing the importance of other areas of study. This could ultimately stifle creativity and innovation in fields that are not considered immediately essential. Furthermore, it may discourage students with a passion for subjects outside the designated categories from pursuing their academic interests, leading to a less diverse and dynamic workforce overall.

In conclusion, while the idea of government-funded university fees for certain fields has its merits, it is crucial to strike a balance between meeting the immediate needs of society and fostering a well-rounded, diverse educational landscape. Instead of completely excluding funding for less immediately relevant subjects, a more equitable solution might involve offering incentives for students to pursue high-demand fields while still supporting a range of academic disciplines. By doing so, governments can ensure that the advantages of their educational policies outweigh the potential disadvantages, ultimately leading to a more prosperous and innovative society.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Leave a Comment