Air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

Air travel has become an integral part of modern society, allowing people to connect with loved ones, conduct business, and explore new destinations. However, there is a growing concern about the environmental impact of air travel, with some advocating for restrictions due to pollution and fuel consumption. In this essay, I will discuss the extent to which I agree with this viewpoint.

It is undeniable that air travel contributes to pollution and exhausts the world’s fuel resources. Aircraft emit greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which contribute to climate change and air quality deterioration. Additionally, the burning of jet fuel depletes finite fossil fuel reserves, raising concerns about energy security and sustainability. These environmental and resource concerns are valid and warrant attention.

However, I do not believe that imposing restrictions on air travel is the most effective solution to address these issues. The aviation industry has made significant strides in improving fuel efficiency and reducing emissions through technological advancements and operational measures. From the development of more fuel-efficient aircraft to the implementation of sustainable aviation fuels, the industry is actively working towards mitigating its environmental impact. Imposing restrictions on air travel could stifle these advancements and hinder progress towards a more sustainable aviation sector.

Furthermore, air travel plays a crucial role in global connectivity, economic growth, and cultural exchange. Restricting air travel could have far-reaching consequences, impacting tourism, trade, and international relations. It is essential to strike a balance between addressing environmental concerns and maintaining the benefits of air travel.

Instead of restricting air travel, a more effective approach would be to incentivize and invest in sustainable aviation technologies. Governments, industry stakeholders, and researchers should collaborate to develop and promote alternative fuels, improve air traffic management systems, and enhance aircraft design. Additionally, promoting energy-efficient practices and encouraging the use of public transportation can help reduce the environmental impact of air travel.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the environmental and resource challenges posed by air travel, I believe that imposing restrictions is not the most viable solution. Instead, a collaborative effort to promote sustainable aviation practices and technologies can help mitigate the environmental impact while preserving the benefits of air travel.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Leave a Comment