Government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily


WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Sample Answer:

In recent years, the increase in air traffic has led to a number of negative consequences, including heightened noise levels, increased pollution, and the need for additional airport construction. This surge in air travel can largely be attributed to the rise in low-cost passenger flights, particularly to popular holiday destinations. As a result, there is a growing debate over whether the government should intervene by imposing heavier taxes on air travel in an effort to reduce its overall impact. In my opinion, I believe that while taxing air traffic may help alleviate some of the associated problems, it is not the most effective solution to the issue at hand.

On one hand, it is undeniable that the current level of air traffic is contributing to environmental degradation and causing disturbances to local communities near airports. Therefore, implementing higher taxes on air travel could potentially deter some individuals from flying, leading to a reduction in the overall volume of air traffic. In addition, the revenue generated from these taxes could be allocated towards funding initiatives aimed at mitigating the negative effects of air travel, such as investing in cleaner aviation technologies or improving public transportation infrastructure.

However, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks of heavily taxing air traffic. Firstly, such measures could disproportionately impact individuals who rely on air travel for essential purposes, such as business or family commitments. Moreover, the aviation industry plays a crucial role in facilitating global connectivity and economic growth, and excessive taxation could hinder these important functions. Instead of solely relying on taxation, a more comprehensive approach to addressing the issue of air traffic should be adopted. This could involve promoting the development and adoption of sustainable aviation technologies, improving the efficiency of air traffic management systems, and investing in alternative modes of transportation.

In conclusion, while taxing air traffic may be a part of the solution, it should not be the sole focus of efforts to reduce its negative impact. A more balanced approach that considers the diverse factors at play is necessary to effectively address the challenges posed by increasing air traffic. By taking a holistic view and implementing a range of measures, we can work towards achieving a more sustainable and harmonious coexistence with air travel.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Leave a Comment