More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations


WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations. Would it be better to build houses in existing towns and cities, or to develop new towns in rural areas?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Sample Answer:

In today’s rapidly growing world, the need for more houses to accommodate increasing populations is becoming a pressing issue in many countries. The question of whether it would be better to build houses in existing towns and cities or to develop new towns in rural areas is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides.

On one hand, building houses in existing towns and cities may seem like the most practical solution. These areas already have established infrastructure, such as roads, schools, hospitals, and other amenities, making it easier to accommodate new residents. Additionally, building within existing urban areas can help to reduce urban sprawl and promote more sustainable development. By utilizing available land in cities, we can make the most of existing resources and reduce the need for long commutes, which in turn can help to minimize environmental impact.

On the other hand, developing new towns in rural areas also has its merits. This approach can help to alleviate the strain on already densely populated urban areas, while also stimulating economic growth in rural regions. Building new towns can also provide an opportunity to design and implement sustainable, eco-friendly communities from the ground up, with a focus on green spaces, renewable energy, and efficient public transportation systems. Furthermore, developing new towns in rural areas can help to distribute economic opportunities more evenly across a country, reducing the concentration of wealth and resources in urban centers.

In conclusion, both options have their advantages and drawbacks, and the best approach may vary depending on the specific needs and circumstances of each country. Ultimately, a balanced approach that considers the long-term sustainability and well-being of both urban and rural areas is crucial. Governments and urban planners must carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option and work towards finding a solution that meets the housing needs of a growing population while also promoting sustainable and inclusive development.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Leave a Comment