Countries should start using nuclear power as their main source of energy


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

Countries should start using nuclear power as their main source of energy; fossil fuels (i.e. coal, oil and gas) are not going to last forever and nuclear power is the cheapest alternative. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether countries should transition to nuclear power as their primary source of energy. While some argue that nuclear power is the most cost-effective and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, others are concerned about the potential risks and long-term consequences of relying on nuclear energy. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and provide my own perspective on the issue.

Proponents of nuclear power argue that it is a more sustainable and affordable option compared to fossil fuels. They point out that fossil fuels are finite resources and will eventually run out, whereas nuclear power can provide a consistent and reliable source of energy for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the cost of nuclear power has decreased significantly in recent years, making it a more economically viable option for many countries. Furthermore, nuclear power does not produce greenhouse gas emissions, which makes it a cleaner alternative to coal, oil, and gas.

On the other hand, opponents of nuclear power raise valid concerns about the potential risks and environmental impact of nuclear energy. The disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima serve as stark reminders of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear accidents. There are also concerns about the long-term storage of nuclear waste and the potential for nuclear proliferation. Additionally, the construction and maintenance of nuclear power plants require significant investment and resources, which may not be feasible for all countries.

In my opinion, while nuclear power does offer certain advantages in terms of sustainability and cost-effectiveness, the potential risks and consequences cannot be overlooked. It is crucial for countries to carefully weigh the pros and cons of nuclear power and consider alternative sources of renewable energy, such as solar and wind power. These options offer a more sustainable and environmentally friendly solution to the world’s energy needs.

In conclusion, while nuclear power may present itself as a viable alternative to fossil fuels, the potential risks and long-term consequences must be carefully considered. It is essential for countries to prioritize the development of renewable energy sources in order to ensure a sustainable and secure energy future for generations to come.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Leave a Comment